Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 11 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 7 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 95 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 238 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |