Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Space Star) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Fiesta) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 24 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |