Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 19 HP less power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Volkswagen Up!. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
912 litres | 959 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Up! (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 845 kg | 1`002 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 358 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Volkswagen Up!. Therefore, Mitsubishi Space Star is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |