Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Toyota Yaris 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 28 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 286 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 51 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |