Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Renault Twingo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 91 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Twingo, but torque is 3 NM less than Renault Twingo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Twingo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Dacia Sandero, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Twingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Renault Twingo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 219 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
912 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star has 16 litres more trunk space than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 8.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 845 kg | 939 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 421 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Twingo has
| |