Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Peugeot 208 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 208 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 11 HP less power than Peugeot 208, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Peugeot 208. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 208, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 208 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 208 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 17 cm shorter than the Peugeot 208, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 311 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1076 litres | |
|
Peugeot 208 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 76 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 208. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 208 (by 164 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 208, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`534 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Peugeot 208 has
| |