Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Opel Adam 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Adam is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 16 HP less power than Opel Adam, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Opel Adam. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm longer than the Opel Adam, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 663 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 65 litres more trunk space than the Opel Adam. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Adam, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Opel Adam has
| |