Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Nissan Micra 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 27 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Micra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 30 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Micra has
| |