Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Mini Cooper 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 65 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Star has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper. The Mini Cooper may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |