Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Kia Picanto 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 67 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 4 HP more power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 8 NM less than Kia Picanto. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Picanto engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1010 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |