Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Hyundai i10 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i10 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 16 HP less power than Hyundai i10, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Hyundai i10. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i10 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 13 cm longer than the Hyundai i10, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1046 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 17 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |