Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Hyundai i10 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 66 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 5 HP more power than Hyundai i10, but torque is 7 NM less than Hyundai i10. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Kia Picanto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i10 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 13 cm longer than the Hyundai i10, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1046 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 17 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |