Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Ford KA 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford KA, but torque is 26 NM less than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 15 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 35 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Ford KA has
| |