Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Dacia Sandero 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 107 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 4 HP less power than Dacia Sandero, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Dacia Sandero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Sandero, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 23 cm shorter than the Dacia Sandero, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
Dacia Sandero has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 85 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Sandero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Sandero (by 288 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.3 metres less than that of the Dacia Sandero, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Dacia Sandero has
| |