Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Citroen C1 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 2 HP more power than Citroen C1, but torque is 7 NM less than Citroen C1. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C1 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 36 cm longer than the Citroen C1, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 196 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 780 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 39 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Citroen C1 has
| |