Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Audi A1 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Space Star) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A1) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 19 HP less power than Audi A1, whereas torque is 142 NM less than Audi A1. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 18 cm shorter than the Audi A1, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 920 litres | |
|
Audi A1 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 35 litres less trunk space than the Audi A1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A1 (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.4 metres less than that of the Audi A1, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Audi A1 has
| |