Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Mazda Premacy 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
1998 - 2002
Mazda Premacy
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 1.91.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 82 - 122 HP90 - 115 HP
Torque: 117 - 215 NM152 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 - 14.5 seconds11.4 - 12.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 8.85.7 - 9.2
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Premacy. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.30 m
Width: 1.72 m1.70 m
Height: 1.52 m1.57 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres420 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litres1848 litres
Mazda Premacy has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Space Star has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 478 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`698~ 1`784
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda Premacy has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv