Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 11.4 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.7 - 9.2 | |
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Premacy. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.57 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Star is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 420 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1848 litres | |
Mazda Premacy has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 478 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`784 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |