Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 114 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 158 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 12.5 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 6.4 - 9.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera Tino. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 23 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 70 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`897 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |