Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 82 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 120 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 10.5 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star 2002. On average, a Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Space Star 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |