Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 115 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 265 NM | 130 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.5 seconds | 10.5 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.0 - 7.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 23 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`642 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Honda Civic has
| |