Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 115 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 265 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.4 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 29 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`276 | ~ 886 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |