Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 115 HP | 65 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 265 NM | 90 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.4 seconds | 12 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.0 - 5.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 34 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`276 | ~ 1`493 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |