Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 80 HP | 60 - 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 - 106 NM | 95 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | 9.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.1 - 4.4 | |
|
On average, the Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Up!. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`333 | ~ 1`336 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |