Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Toyota Yaris 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 80 HP | 69 - 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 - 106 NM | 95 - 169 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | 11 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.3 - 5.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 347 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 112 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`333 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |