Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Toyota Aygo 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 80 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 - 106 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | 13.8 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 33 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 168 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 67 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`333 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |