Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Kia Picanto 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 - 80 HP | 67 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 88 - 106 NM | 96 - 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | 10.1 - 14.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.2 - 5.4 | |
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.80 m | 3.60 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1010 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 98 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`333 | ~ 1`400 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |