Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Kia Picanto 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2016 - 2019
Kia Picanto
2017 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.21.0 - 1.2

Performance

Power: 71 - 80 HP67 - 100 HP
Torque: 88 - 106 NM96 - 172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 - 13.6 seconds10.1 - 14.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 4.24.2 - 5.4
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)141 mm (5.6 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 3.80 m3.60 m
Width: 1.67 m1.60 m
Height: 1.51 m1.49 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
912 litres1010 litres
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 98 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`333~ 1`400
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 680010 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Kia Picanto has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv