Mitsubishi Outlander 2021 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volvo XC60), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 225 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 15.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |