Mitsubishi Outlander 2021 vs Audi Q5 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Audi Q5) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 84 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.8 l/100km + 19.4 kWh/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 54 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 331 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 331 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2217 litres | 1405 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 812 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`355 kg | 2`660 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`630 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 725 kg | 585 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Audi Q5. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |