Mitsubishi Outlander 2019 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 99 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |