Mitsubishi Outlander 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.2 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |