Mitsubishi Outlander 2019 vs Mercedes GLC 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLC is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 61 HP less power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Mercedes GLC. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes GLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes GLC, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 4 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |