Mitsubishi Outlander 2019 vs BMW X3 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X3) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 205 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.4 | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |