Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 185 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 189 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 | 2.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 2380 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 42 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |