Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Seat Leon 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Seat Leon), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Leon is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 15 HP less power than Seat Leon, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Seat Leon. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.8 l/100km | 4.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 8.90 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 15 cm longer than the Seat Leon, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 587 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Leon has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Leon, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`283 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 627 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Seat Leon. Therefore, Seat Leon is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Seat Leon has
| |