Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Honda CR-V) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 31 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 7.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1155 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 18 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 93 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 647 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |