Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Renault Koleos 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Renault Koleos) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 36 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 15.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 1690 litres | |
|
Renault Koleos has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 88 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`157 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`607 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 550 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |