Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Nissan X-Trail), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 109 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.8 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 463 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 87 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 720 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |