Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Citroen C5 Aircross), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 42 HP less power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 189 NM less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 | 5.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm longer than the Citroen C5 Aircross, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 117 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 Aircross. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |