Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Citroen C5 Aircross), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 43 HP less power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 189 NM less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2500 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm longer than the Citroen C5 Aircross, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 Aircross (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 570 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Therefore, Citroen C5 Aircross is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |