Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 376 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |