Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 23 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Peugeot 4007, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 264 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |