Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 27 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Hyundai Santa FE are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 246 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |