Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 199 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Citroen C-Crosser have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Outlander version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Citroen C-Crosser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 333 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C-Crosser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |