Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Toyota RAV4 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Lexus IS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 33 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1752 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 188 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |