Mitsubishi Outlander 2010 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 83 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-7 2007: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Outlander has 319 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 917 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |