Mitsubishi Outlander 2010 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 48 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 376 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |