Mitsubishi Outlander 2010 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, but torque is 20 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Outlander has 319 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 917 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
| |