Mitsubishi Outlander 2010 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 335 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 27 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.3 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
Mitsubishi Outlander and Hyundai Santa FE are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 774 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 2274 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`520 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | low | |
Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5800 | 8800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |