Mitsubishi Outlander 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 14 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 129 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1577 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 297 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |