Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 90 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Outlander has 319 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 917 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |