Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 15 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 955 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 218 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 736 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |